Connotea: Bookmarks matching tag oa.new (50 items) |
- Publishers have become the enemies of science
- Stanford Linked Data Workshop Technology Plan
- Research:Committee/Areas of interest/Open-access policy/Request for Information on Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications Resulting From Federally Funded Research - Meta
- The White House wants your thoughts on open access to scientific publications! Deadline January 12! | Functional Neurogenesis
- Daniel Mietchen, Encouraging reuse of Open Access materials – a response to the OSTP’s RFI on Publications
- Cameron Neylon, Response to OSTP RFI on Public Access to Publicly Funded Research
- John Wilbanks, Response to RFI on Public Access
- ARL Response to White House RFI on Public Access to Scholarly Publications (Jan. 11, '12)
- Attack on Open Access - Fairly Used
- The Impact of the NIH Public Access Policy On Professional and Scholarly Publishing
- All 50 State Librarians Vote to Form Alliance With Internet Archive’s Open Library — The Digital Shift
- Does open access really threaten peer review?
- Folger Tooltips: Introducing “Folger Collection, by Folger Readers” | The Collation
- jstor opens limited free access option non-subscribing scholars | Inside Higher Ed
- Indian scientist bags open access award - SciDev.Net
- Coliibri
- Coliibri Tutorial Video v2
- Main Page - Harvard Open Access Project
- Support the Open Access Movement: Stop the Research Works Act! - The Petition Site
- Royal Society OA membership
Publishers have become the enemies of science Posted: 16 Jan 2012 05:23 AM PST Science news, comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk, (16 Jan 2012) "The US Research Works Act would allow publishers to line their pockets by locking publicly funded research behind paywalls...." |
Stanford Linked Data Workshop Technology Plan Posted: 15 Jan 2012 07:46 PM PST www.clir.org "This is a plan for a multi-national, multi-institutional discovery environment built on Linked Open Data principles...." |
Posted: 15 Jan 2012 07:44 PM PST meta.wikimedia.org "To highlight this aspect of reusing materials from Open-Access sources, our responses to the individual questions have been drafted in public and shall build and comment on publicly available responses submitted by others. A link to these responses will be provided the first time we quote them. An overview of all public responses that we consulted in drafting our own is given in the Publicly available responses by third parties section. In addition to commenting on the issues raised in the questions, we have added a separate section with examples and comments that highlight how Open Access materials can be reused on projects like those we operate...." |
Posted: 15 Jan 2012 07:43 PM PST |
Posted: 15 Jan 2012 07:40 PM PST Encouraging reuse of Open Access materials a response to the OSTPs RFI on Publications Wikimedian in Residence, (12 Jan 2012) |
Cameron Neylon, Response to OSTP RFI on Public Access to Publicly Funded Research Posted: 15 Jan 2012 07:37 PM PST |
John Wilbanks, Response to RFI on Public Access Posted: 15 Jan 2012 07:34 PM PST del-fi.org "This is my response to the White House RFI on Public Access...." |
ARL Response to White House RFI on Public Access to Scholarly Publications (Jan. 11, '12) Posted: 15 Jan 2012 07:30 PM PST Association of Research Libraries (ARL) - Full Feed, (11 Jan 2012) "Enhancing public access to federally funded research results is a priority for ARL and its member libraries because such policies are integrally tied to and support the mission of higher education and scholarship. ARL believes that extending and enhancing public access policies to federally funded research to other science and technology agencies will drive scientific discovery and innovation, and promote economic growth. Extending enhanced public access policies to other federal agencies is long overdue...." |
Attack on Open Access - Fairly Used Posted: 15 Jan 2012 07:26 PM PST fairuse.stanford.edu "Critics of the [NIH] policy are making a move, yet again, to eviscerate it...." |
The Impact of the NIH Public Access Policy On Professional and Scholarly Publishing Posted: 15 Jan 2012 07:23 PM PST www.publishers.org Part of the AAP argument against the NIH policy: "When an author asks a publisher to publish a research article, the author agrees to transfer copyright so the publisher will undertake the effort and expense of preparing the article for final publication. The publisher relies on holding copyright to enable it to recoup publication costs and continue to invest in scientific communication. The full benefit of copyright protections is weakened when authors are required to permit NIH to make their journal articles available to the public for free. Moreover, the mandated access policy gives publishers little or no subsequent safeguards from piracy. Scientists should not be limited to publishing in a few compliant journals. Doing so inhibits intellectual freedom and scholarly independence and is, quite simply, against the public interest...." |
Posted: 15 Jan 2012 07:16 PM PST www.thedigitalshift.com "All 50 state librarians have decided to throw their weight behind the Internet Archive’s Open Library lending program. The Chief Officers of State Library Agencies (COSLA) voted unanimously during a meeting held October 24-26 in Santa Fe, NM, to enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Internet Archive (IA) that will essentially make the state librarian in each state a point person for the Open Library’s lending program...." |
Does open access really threaten peer review? Posted: 15 Jan 2012 07:15 PM PST |
Folger Tooltips: Introducing “Folger Collection, by Folger Readers” | The Collation Posted: 15 Jan 2012 02:10 PM PST archivalia.tumblr.com |
jstor opens limited free access option non-subscribing scholars | Inside Higher Ed Posted: 15 Jan 2012 01:20 PM PST www.insidehighered.com "For a subscription-based content vault like JSTOR, the economy of the modern Web is a double-edged sword....This edge can cut for you — and JSTOR has begun trying to wield it to expand the archive’s user base. In 2009, the nonprofit opened its Alumni Access pilot, a program that allows subscribing institutions to pay an extra fee to buy lifetime access to the archive for its alumni. Then, last September, JSTOR announced its Early Journal Content program, which allows anybody in the world to download hundreds of thousands of the older articles in its archive for free, no matter where they went to college. Now JSTOR is getting ready to go one step further, by cutting a small window in its paywall for visitors who are not affiliated with any subscribing institution. The new program, called Register & Read, will soon let anybody read articles in the JSTOR archives at no cost. Under the new program, unsubscribed visitors will be allowed to check out three “items” from the JSTOR archive every two weeks, which they will be able to read for free. In order to prevent piracy, the texts will be displayed as image files (so that text cannot be copied). Users will not be able to download the files...." |
Indian scientist bags open access award - SciDev.Net Posted: 15 Jan 2012 01:17 PM PST www.scidev.net "Efforts at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore, to create an open access repository for research papers have resulted in recognition this month (1 January) from the Electronic Publishing Trust (EPT) for Development in the United Kingdom. Francis Jayakanth, who manages the IISc’s National Centre for Science Information (NCSI), claimed the first international award instituted by EPT for individuals working in developing countries who have helped advance open access and the free exchange of research findings. Runners-up for the award were Ina Smith from the University of Stellenbosch, South Africa, Tatyana Zayseva from Khazar University, Azerbaijan, and Xiaolin Zang of the National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Science...." |
Posted: 15 Jan 2012 01:12 PM PST www.coliibri.com "Coliibri.com is a new platform for creation that allows you to: [1] Offer a spark of an innovative idea or artistic creation or [2] Ask for a creative solution / invention / creation from others and [3] Watch as other expand on your contribution in numerous, sometimes unpredictable ways. [4] See your contribution become part of a larger creation. [5] Engage by participating in real-world, cutting-edge projects. [6] Contribute an idea that does not expire. So, what may seem like a silly idea today, may spark an amazing idea two years in the future. You may take any part of a creation and freely re-use it and benefit from it. All user contributions are licensed as Creative Commons Share-Alike (CC BY-SA 3.0)....With Coliibri.com, you play a game that eliminates many of the traditional rules behind new creation and invention. You play on a leveled field with talents from all over the world...." |
Posted: 15 Jan 2012 01:08 PM PST www.coliibri.com "A short walk-through of how to develop, grow, and share innovative and creative ideas into the global Commons using Coliibri.com. Search, contribute to existing ideas, or add a new idea...." |
Main Page - Harvard Open Access Project Posted: 15 Jan 2012 12:07 PM PST cyber.law.harvard.edu The goals of the Harvard Open Access Project (HOAP) are "[t]o foster OA within Harvard, foster OA beyond Harvard, undertake research and policy analysis on OA, and provide OA to timely and accurate information about OA itself...." [The project was launched at the start of the 2011-12 academic year, but this project wiki was launched yesterday.] |
Support the Open Access Movement: Stop the Research Works Act! - The Petition Site Posted: 15 Jan 2012 08:17 AM PST www.thepetitionsite.com "Sign [this petition] now to tell legislators that the Research Works Act puts the profits of publishers above the best interests of people. Tell them to reject H.R. 3699...." |
Posted: 15 Jan 2012 07:49 AM PST groups.google.com "The Royal Society has this week confirmed that it is at the leading edge of open access in scientific publishing by launching two innovative new open access membership programmes. The programmes allow institutions to support open access for their researchers by giving them a discount of 25% when they publish open access articles in the Royal Society’s renowned international scientific journals. The Excellence in Science Membership is relevant for institutions publishing across all areas of science and Open Biology Membership for those who wish to just support researchers in the biological sciences at the cellular and molecular level. Institutions are given a personalised webpage on the Royal Society publishing site, showcasing their research and linking through to the full text of the article...." |
You are subscribed to email updates from Connotea: Bookmarks matching tag oa.new To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment